Solution for Developers & Technical TeamsDeveloper handoff console

Give clients a content layer without building a custom CMS.

Acrosite helps developers and technical teams connect Git-backed websites, map content paths, configure deployment trigger profiles, and give clients a safe publishing workflow without exposing repositories or technical settings.

GitHub AppMarkdown / MDXContent pathsDeployment triggersClient-safe review

The developer problem

Every finished website still needs a content workflow.

The build ships, but the content requests do not stop — and without a publishing layer, each one routes back through the developer.

Post-launch backlog

#412Recurring

Clients need edits after launch.

Blog posts, service pages, pricing updates, FAQs, and announcements keep coming after the project ships.

opened · client

#377Scope

Custom admin panels do not scale.

Building auth, editors, media handling, content schemas, review flows, and publishing logic for every client wastes development time.

assigned · developer

#356Access

GitHub is not client-friendly.

Clients should not need branches, commits, pull requests, repository permissions, or deployment settings to update content.

opened · client

#341Support

Developers become support desks.

Small content changes turn into tickets, commits, deploy checks, and repeated follow-up work.

assigned · developer

#318UX

Markdown is great until non-technical users need it.

Markdown/MDX gives developers control, but clients and editors need a safer interface.

opened · client

#290Security

Deployment details should stay technical.

Repository access, deployment trigger profiles, custom headers, and provider settings should stay away from client users.

assigned · developer

Setup once

Connect the technical pieces once, then let content teams operate.

GitHub, content paths, output format, deployment triggers, and client access are configured by the developer — and everything technical stays scoped to authorized roles.

Project setup · acme-projectSetup complete5 / 5

GitHub connection

GitHub App installed

Repository client-site

Branch main

Write access tested

Connected

Content paths

content/posts

content/pages

content/case-studies

public/images

Mapped

Output format

Markdown / MDX

Frontmatter

Slug rules

Media references

Tested

Deployment trigger

VercelSelected

Manual / No Automatic Deploymentavailable

Netlify · Cloudflare Pagescoming soon

GitHub Actions · Custom Webhookcoming soon

Deployment trigger profile configured

Client access

Team Members invited

Client Reviewers · assigned content only

No GitHub access

Deployment & billing hidden

Repo mapping

Keep your repo structure. Give your client a clean editor.

Acrosite lets developers map project content to the folders and formats their site already expects — no frontend rewrite required.

Your repository · client-site

Acrosite content structure

Posts→content/posts

Pages→content/pages

Custom Content Types→content/case-studies

Custom Fields→frontmatter

SEO fields→frontmatter

Media references→public/images

Published content becomes Markdown/MDX with frontmatter in the connected repository. Drafts, reviews, scheduling, and permissions stay in Acrosite.

Client handoff

Give clients publishing access without giving them GitHub.

Clients can review assigned content, approve changes, and participate in publishing without seeing repositories, branches, deploy triggers, billing, or internal workspace settings.

Client view

What the client sees

PAGE · ASSIGNED FOR REVIEWService Page: Pricing Update

Assigned content

Review comments

Approve / Request changes

Published URL if allowed

Simple status labels

Scoped out

What the client never sees

GitHub settingsrepo

Deployment trigger profiledeploy

Branch / path configurationconfig

Team permissionsroles

Billingplan

Other clients / projectsscope

Less support work

Reduce routine content-update tickets after launch.

After setup, routine content updates move through Acrosite instead of becoming recurring developer tasks.

Before · routes to dev

1Client emails content change
2Developer edits MDX
3Developer commits to GitHub
4Developer checks deployment trigger result
5Client requests another change

After · runs in Acrosite

1Client or team creates draft
2Editor reviews
3Client approves
4Content is scheduled or published
5Publish Logs show result

Fewer routine edit tickets

Cleaner client handoff

Less custom CMS maintenance

Developers keep control of the parts clients should not touch.

Technical setup stays scoped to authorized roles while non-technical users work through a safer publishing interface.

GitHub App access

Connect repositories through a GitHub App instead of personal access tokens.

Repository and branch control

Choose the project repository, branch, and content paths during setup.

Protected deployment triggers

Provider URLs, custom headers, workflow parameters, and tokens stay server-side.

Publish Logs

See commit status, deployment trigger result, failure reason, and retry visibility.

Role-aware access

Developers, Team Members, and Client Reviewers each get the right level of access.

Workspace and project isolation

Client and project data stay scoped by workspace, project, role, and assignment.

Technical scenarios

Where developers and technical teams use Acrosite.

One publishing layer, applied across the project types technical teams ship and maintain.

Next.js marketing websites

Give clients a publishing dashboard for Posts, Pages, and structured content without building a custom admin.

Client website handoff

Launch the site, connect Acrosite, configure paths, and leave the client with a safe content workflow.

Freelance retainers

Reduce recurring small-update tickets while still controlling repository and deployment setup.

Small technical teams

Standardize content handoff across multiple client projects without maintaining separate CMS codebases.

Developer-led agencies

Keep GitHub technical access internal while writers, editors, and clients use Acrosite.

Structured content projects

Use Custom Content Types for case studies, FAQs, authors, services, locations, resources, and other project-specific content.

Recommended plans

Plans for solo builders, technical teams, and developer-led agencies.

Start where your project count is today and move up as clients, team, and publishing volume grow.

Solo

For individual developers and founders managing a few Git-backed websites.

3 projects
1 Team Member

Creator

For small technical teams managing multiple websites and collaborators.

10 projects
3 Team Members

Recommended

Agency Starter

For freelancers, technical teams, and agencies managing client websites with review and publishing workflows.

25 projects
7 Team Members

Agency Pro

For content-heavy technical teams managing more projects, Team Members, Client Reviewers per project, and monthly publishing volume.

100 projects
15 Team Members

View Pricing Contact Us

Developer FAQ

Questions technical teams ask first.

Repo control, frontend impact, deployment triggers, and recovery — the details that decide whether you build a CMS or connect one.

Open documentation

Do clients need GitHub access?

No. Clients and Client Reviewers can review assigned content without repository, branch, deployment, billing, team, or internal project access.

Do I need to change my website frontend?

No. Acrosite publishes Markdown/MDX with frontmatter to your connected repository. Your existing website reads content from the repo the way it already expects.

Can I control the content paths?

Yes. Developers can configure paths for Posts, Pages, Custom Content Types, and media during project setup.

What deployment providers can Acrosite trigger?

Acrosite supports Manual / No Automatic Deployment and automatic Vercel deploy hook triggers. Netlify, Cloudflare Pages, GitHub Actions, Custom Webhook, Render, DigitalOcean App Platform, AWS Amplify, GitHub Pages, and Firebase Hosting appear as Coming Soon and cannot be configured yet.

Does Acrosite replace my codebase?

No. Your website stays in your repository. Acrosite is the content operations and publishing layer around it.

Can I use Custom Content Types?

Yes. Custom Content Types can model project-specific content such as Case Studies, FAQs, Services, Locations, Authors, Testimonials, Resources, or Glossary items.

Can clients publish directly?

Not by default. Client Reviewers can review, comment, approve, or request changes. Publishing should remain controlled by authorized internal roles.

What happens if publishing fails?

Publish Logs show safe failure details and retry paths where possible, so developers or authorized team members can inspect and recover.

Can Acrosite work for multiple client projects?

Yes. Acrosite is designed around workspaces, clients, and projects so technical teams can manage multiple Git-backed website projects with clear context.

Start here

Give every client site a safer publishing layer.

Registration is coming soon. Contact us to talk through your publishing workflow, or read the docs to see how Acrosite works.

Registration opening soonGitHub AppMarkdown/MDXDeployment triggersClient Reviewers