Feedback lands in too many places.
Client comments can end up in email, Slack, Docs, calls, spreadsheets, and screenshots.
Acrosite gives Client Reviewers a dedicated review dashboard where they can see assigned projects, review assigned content, comment, approve, or request changes — without seeing GitHub, deployment settings, billing, team settings, or unrelated projects.
Client sign-off should be simple. Without one place to do it, feedback scatters, status blurs, and clients end up closer to your internal tools than they should be.
Client comments can end up in email, Slack, Docs, calls, spreadsheets, and screenshots.
GitHub, deployment triggers, billing, team roles, and project settings should stay inside the team workspace.
Teams need to know what is waiting for a client, approved, or sent back for changes.
Clients should review the actual content item, not disconnected copy pasted into another tool.
Client Reviewers should not see unrelated projects, internal notes, or other clients.
Approved content can move forward. Content with requested changes should return to the team.
Client Reviewers log in once and see the projects and review work assigned to them. They can find what needs review, what was approved, what needs changes, and what has already been published — without entering the internal workspace.
From the Client Reviewer dashboard, reviewers can open an assigned item, read the content, leave comments, approve, or request changes — on one screen, with nothing technical and nothing from other projects.
Project-level access lets a Client Reviewer participate in reviews for that project, but individual content visibility depends on assignment or review submission status. The boundary is built in, not bolted on.
Comments, approvals, and requested changes stay tied to the content item so the team can act without searching through scattered messages.
Client leaves context-specific feedback.
Content moves back to the team with a clear review status.
Approved content can move toward scheduling or publishing.
The internal team works with the complete platform. Client Reviewers get a deliberately smaller surface — only what review needs.
Teams can use Review Queue and status labels to see which content is waiting for client review, approved, or needs changes.
Acrosite routes review requests to Client Reviewers through account-based access, keeping each review tied to the correct project and content item.
A focused review layer with deliberate edges — here is what it does, and what it does not try to be.
A short list to confirm before sending content out — most of it is part of normal content setup.
Invite the Client Reviewer to the project.
The reviewer accepts the invitation and logs in or creates an Acrosite account.
Create the Post, Page, or Custom Content Type item that needs review.
Submit or assign the content for client review.
Add clear context so the reviewer knows what to check.
Confirm that the reviewer only sees assigned projects, assigned content, and review history where they are involved.
Access, what a reviewer can do, publishing control, visibility, and which content types apply — the specifics teams ask before inviting a client.
Open documentationRegistration is coming soon. Contact us to talk through your publishing workflow, or read the docs to see how Acrosite works.