Registration is coming soon. Acrosite is not open for sign-up yet.Contact us
Workflow

Scheduled publishing workflow: from approval to GitHub commit

Scheduling Git-backed content shouldn't mean cron scripts or early commits. Acrosite keeps approved drafts private until the scheduled time, then validates the content, commits Markdown/MDX to GitHub, and triggers your configured deployment.

Manual publishing

May rely on reminders, cron scripts, or early commits that the website has to filter.

Acrosite

May fit teams that want approved content to publish automatically at a scheduled time.

How to decide

The right choice depends on whether you want manual timing or a built-in scheduled publishing workflow.

Side by side

Manual publishing and Acrosite, compared

Approaches differ by team and setup — verify current specifics against each tool's documentation.

Feature / workflow
Manual publishingReminders, cron, or early commits
AcrositeGit-backed publishing platform
Primary use case
Manual publishingPublishing timed by hand or by scripts
AcrositeDesigned for content publishing operations across projects
Content model
Manual publishingContent committed manually when due
AcrositePosts, Pages, and Custom Content Types
Posts
Manual publishingDepends on the process
AcrositeAvailable
Pages
Manual publishingDepends on the process
AcrositeAvailable
Custom Content Types
Manual publishingDepends on the process
AcrositeAvailable
Custom Fields
Manual publishingDepends on the process
AcrositeAvailable
Git-backed publishing
Manual publishingCommits go to the repository
AcrositeAvailable
Access for non-technical users
Manual publishingOften developer-led
AcrositeNot required for writers or Client Reviewers
Team Members
Manual publishingDepends on the process
AcrositeAvailable
Client Reviewers
Manual publishingHandled separately
AcrositeAvailable
Review & approval workflow
Manual publishingHandled separately
AcrositeBuilt-in review and approval
Scheduled publishing
Manual publishingReminders, cron, or early commits
AcrositeDesigned for this workflow
Content Calendar
Manual publishingNot built in
AcrositeAvailable
Publish Logs
Manual publishingNot built in
AcrositeAvailable
Multi-project agency workflow
Manual publishingHard to keep consistent
AcrositeDesigned for multi-project workflows
Deployment trigger visibility
Manual publishingDepends on your pipeline
AcrositeVisible in Publish Logs
SEO-focused publishing workflow
Manual publishingDepends on the front end
AcrositeStructured fields support SEO workflows
Best-fit team
Manual publishingTeams comfortable timing publishing manually
AcrositeAgencies, website owners, and content teams

This is a high-level workflow comparison. The right fit depends on your website setup, team workflow, and publishing requirements.

What changes

What changes in the workflow?

With manual publishing
  • 01Someone remembers when content should go live.
  • 02Content is committed by hand or via a script at that time.
  • 03Early commits may need to be filtered by the website.
With Acrosite
  • 01The team creates Posts, Pages, and Custom Content Types.
  • 02Writers and editors work without GitHub access.
  • 03Client Reviewers can review their assigned content.
  • 04Approved content can be scheduled.
  • 05Acrosite commits to GitHub and records Publish Logs.
Decision guide

When should you choose which?

If your priority is…
Better fit may be…
Why
Hands-off scheduled publishing
Better fitAcrosite
WhyApproved content publishes automatically at the scheduled time
Timezone-aware scheduling
Better fitAcrosite
WhyChoose date, time, and timezone for each publish
Visibility into each publish
Better fitAcrosite
WhyPublish Logs record trigger results and recovery context
One-off manual publish
Better fitA manual commit
WhyMinimal process for a single timed publish
Git-backed ownership with a publishing workflow
Better fitAcrosite
WhyContent lives in Git with review, scheduling, and Publish Logs
What Acrosite includes

Publishing operations, built in

Review workflow

Move content through review and approval before publishing.

Scheduled publishing

Schedule approved content with date, time, and timezone.

GitHub publishing

Acrosite commits content to your connected repository.

Publish Logs

See trigger results and recovery context for each publish.

Client Reviewers

Clients review assigned content without GitHub access.

Posts, Pages & Custom Content Types

Model the content you publish across projects.

Custom Fields

Add the fields each content type needs.

Team Members

Give your team publishing roles without repository access.

FAQ

Common questions

You schedule approved content for a future date, time, and timezone. Acrosite keeps it private until then, then commits it to GitHub.

No. Scheduled content is not committed early; it is committed at the scheduled publish time.

Publishing attempts are recorded in Publish Logs, failures are visible, and safe retry paths are available where possible.

For a single timed publish without an ongoing schedule, a manual commit may be enough.

Try a simpler Git-backed publishing workflow.

Registration is coming soon. Contact us to talk through your publishing workflow, or read the docs to see how Acrosite works.